|
The
constitution prohibits torture,
and there were no reports that
government officials employed it;
however, courts applying Shari'a
(Islamic law) sometimes imposed
flogging sentences on both Muslims
and non-Muslims as punishment for
adultery, prostitution, and
consensual premarital sex. In
March, the Dubai Shari'a court
sentenced a pregnant Asian
housemaid to 150 lashes and
deportation for adultery.
Flogging was also imposed as
punishment for defamation of
character, and drug or alcohol
abuse. There were credible reports
that some authorities used leather
straps and canes to administer
floggings, which left substantial
bruising, welts, and open wounds
on the recipients' bodies.
Most
Prison and Detention Center
Conditions
Prison conditions generally met
international standards; however,
prison conditions varied widely
from emirate to emirate, and some
rural prisons were overcrowded and
had spartan living conditions.
Again during the year, there were
reports of prison overcrowding in
Abu Dhabi and Dubai prisons.
Noncitizens represented
approximately 75 percent of all
prisoners. Men and women were
housed separately. Conditions for
women were equal to or slightly
better than those for men.
Pretrial detainees were held
separately from convicted
criminals before trial. Juveniles
were held separately from adults.
Prisoners convicted on national
security grounds were held
separately from the general
populace, in special sections of
the regular prisons. Conditions in
these sections were not
significantly different than other
parts of the prisons. There were
credible reports that government
officials discriminated against
prisoners with HIV by not granting
commuted sentences or parole that
other prisoners with similar
records had received.
Police in Dubai and Abu Dhabi
stated that NGOs and the
International Committee of the Red
Cross have access to observe
prison conditions if requested;
however, there were no reports of
any requests for such visits
during the year.
Representatives of religious and
national communities regularly met
with prisoners. Representatives
from the General Women's Union (GWU),
a local organization partially
funded by the government,
regularly met with female
prisoners, helped them
financially, and paid airfare,
when necessary, to repatriate
noncitizens after their release.
d. Arbitrary Arrest or Detention
The constitution prohibits
arbitrary arrest and detention;
however, there were reports that
the government held persons in
official custody without charge;
and that the government charged
individuals but denied them a
preliminary judicial hearing
within a reasonable period. The
law permits indefinite
incommunicado detention without
appeal, and in one case the
government held a prisoner
incommunicado for several months
at least.
Role of the Police and Security
Apparatus
The federal Ministry of Interior
oversees Police General
Directorates in each of the seven
emirates; however, each emirate,
via its corresponding Police
General Directorate, maintains its
own police force and supervises
the police stations therein. While
all emirate police forces
theoretically are branches of the
ministry, in practice they operate
with considerable autonomy. Police
stations take complaints from the
public, make arrests, and forward
all cases to the public
prosecutor. These cases are then
transferred to the courts. All
cases are filed with the Ministry
of Interior. While reported
incidents of police corruption are
uncommon, the ministry intervened
several times in criminal cases to
keep local police actions in
harmony with federal law and
policy.
The government has taken measures
to upgrade police capability to
enforce anti-trafficking
standards. In May, the government
created a 70-person
anti-trafficking section within
the Ministry of Interior, and in
October Dubai Police established a
special Human Trafficking section
that works in conjunction with the
Human Rights Care Department.
Arrest and Detention
The law prohibits arrest or search
without reasonable belief, but the
government did not always observe
these provisions in practice.
There were credible reports that
security forces failed to obtain
warrants in many cases. Indefinite
detention without charge is
permitted upon judicial review.
Under the Criminal Procedures
Code, police are directed to
report arrests within 48 hours to
public prosecutors, who must
determine within the next 24 hours
whether to charge, release, or
further detain the suspect pending
an investigation. Public
prosecutors may order that
detainees be held up to 21 days
without charge. In cases of
felonies or misdemeanors
punishable by imprisonment,
authorities must obtain court
orders after 21 days for
additional detention.
Court-ordered extensions may not
exceed an additional 30 days of
detention without charge; however,
judges may continue to renew this
30-day detention period
indefinitely and without charge.
Suspects have the right to protest
any extensions of their detention
periods ordered in absentia,
although this right was not
afforded in cases of incommunicado
detention. An anti-terrorism law
passed in July 2004 allows public
prosecutors to hold suspects in
terrorism-related cases without
charge for 6 months, an increase
over the previous 3-week limit.
Once a suspect is charged,
terrorism cases are handled by the
Supreme Court, which may extend
the detention period indefinitely.
Several diplomatic missions again
expressed concern that authorities
failed to provide consular
notification when their citizens
were detained or arrested.
There is no formal system of bail;
however, authorities can release
detainees temporarily who deposit
money, an important document such
as a passport, or an unsecured
personal guarantee statement
signed by a third party. Those
arrested on non-security charges
were generally allowed to
telephone third parties while in
detention.
Defendants in cases involving loss
of life, including involuntary
manslaughter, can be denied
release in accordance with the
law. Release usually is permitted
after a payment of compensation to
the victims' families, commonly
called diya or "blood money,"
which is a form of financial
penalty imposed on defendants in
criminal cases involving a
killing.
A defendant is entitled to an
attorney only after the police
have completed their
investigation. As a result, police
can question accused persons
sometimes for days or weeks
without benefit of legal counsel
if the Prosecutor General
approves.
There were no reports of political
detainees.
Amnesty
Rulers of the individual emirates
regularly pardon and pay the debts
of prisoners on religious and
national holidays. During the
year, at least 1,420 prisoners
were pardoned, and $2 million (7.2
million dirhams) in debts paid.
Most pardoned foreign nationals
were deported.
e. Denial of Fair Public Trial
The constitution provides for an
independent judiciary; however,
its decisions are subject to
review by the political
leadership. The judiciary,
composed largely of contracted
foreign nationals potentially
subject to deportation, was not
generally considered independent.
The law prohibits women from
serving in the judiciary.
There is a dual court system.
Shari'a (Islamic law) courts
adjudicate criminal and family law
matters based on each emirate's
interpretation of Islamic law;
civil courts adjudicate civil law
matters. Civil courts generally
are part of the federal system,
except in the Dubai and Ras al-Khaimah
emirates, and are accountable to
the Federal Supreme Court, which
has the power of judicial review
as well as original jurisdiction
in disputes between emirates or
between the federal government and
individual emirates. The emirates
of Dubai and Ras al-Khaimah have
their own local and appellate
courts, which have jurisdiction
over matters within their
territories that the constitution
and federal legislation do not
specifically reserve for the
federal system. The emirates of
Dubai and Ras al-Khaimah do not
refer cases in their courts to the
Federal Supreme Court for judicial
review, although they maintain a
liaison with the federal Ministry
of Justice, Islamic Affairs, and
Endowments.
Each emirate administers Shari'a
courts. In some emirates, these
courts consider all types of civil
and commercial cases as well as
criminal cases and family matters.
They act in accordance with their
interpretation of Islamic law, but
also are required to answer to the
Federal Supreme Court, with the
exception of the emirates of Dubai
and Ras al-Khaimah. In criminal
cases, Shari'a is applied first
and, if evidence required by
Shari'a is found insufficient, the
Penal Code is used. Dubai has a
special Shi'a council to act on
matters pertaining to Shi'a family
law (see section 5).
Trial Procedures
The constitution does not provide
accused persons the right to a
speedy trial, but does provide the
right to a fair public trial.
Civil defendants at times demanded
same‑day disposition of the cases
filed against them. Authorities
generally brought criminal
defendants to trial within two to
three months, with the exception
of more slow-moving drug‑related
cases, in which authorities are
required to inform the office of
the ruler for the emirate in which
the offense was committed. There
were credible reports that these
cases often took more than six
months to go to trial.
Trials can last more than a year,
depending on the seriousness of
the charges, number of witnesses,
and availability of judges. In Abu
Dhabi Emirate, review of criminal
cases by the local ruler's court,
or diwan, as well as an extralegal
requirement that the diwan approve
the release of every prisoner
whose sentence has been completed,
resulted in bureaucratic delays in
processing or releasing prisoners,
and some prisoners served time
beyond their original sentences.
Approximately 50 percent of
federal judges were noncitizen
Arabs, whose mandates were subject
to periodic renewal by the
government. In contrast, judicial
positions held by citizens are
permanent and are subject to
termination only for specific
reasons set out in the Judicial
Authority law. The percentage of
citizens serving as public
prosecutors and judges,
particularly at the federal level,
continued to increase. Although
each emirate varies, approximately
75 percent of public prosecutors
were citizens.
Defendants have a limited right to
legal counsel. Under the Criminal
Procedures Code, the defendant has
a right to request
government-provided counsel in all
cases involving a capital crime or
possible life imprisonment,
regardless of whether the
defendant is financially able to
hire counsel. The government may
provide counsel, at its
discretion, to indigent defendants
charged with felonies punishable
by imprisonment of 3 to 15 years.
The Penal Procedures Law states
that defense counsel may be
present during any investigation,
but only at the prosecutor's
discretion.
Defendants are presumed innocent
until proven guilty. All trials
are before judges, not juries, and
trials are public, except for
national security cases and those
deemed by the judge likely to harm
public morality. By law all
prosecutions are conducted in
Arabic; the defendant has no right
to a translator.
Each court system has an appeals
process. Death sentences may be
appealed to the ruler of the
emirate in which the offense is
committed, or to the president of
the federation, although in the
case of murder, only the victim's
family may commute a death
sentence. The government normally
negotiates with victims' families
for the defendant to offer
financial compensation, or diya,
to the victims' families to
receive their forgiveness and
commute death sentences.
Non-Muslims who are tried for
criminal offenses in Shari'a
courts can receive civil penalties
at the discretion of the judge.
Shari'a penalties imposed on
non-Muslims can be overturned or
modified by a higher court.
In cases in which a defendant is
acquitted, the prosecutor may
appeal the acquittal to a higher
court. The higher court may
receive additional evidence. An
appellate court must reach
unanimous agreement to overturn an
acquittal.
The local rulers' diwans,
following traditional
prerogatives, maintained the
practice of reviewing many types
of criminal and civil offenses
before cases were referred to the
prosecutor's office. The diwans
may review sentences passed by
judges and return cases to the
court on appeal. The diwans'
involvement, which typically
occurs when the case involves
parties from two different
emirates or a citizen and a
noncitizen, can lead to lengthy
delays prior to and following the
judicial process.
The military has its own court
system. Military tribunals try
only military personnel. National
security cases are heard solely by
the Supreme Court.
Political Prisoners
There were no reports of political
prisoners.
f. Arbitrary Interference with
Privacy, Family, Home, or
Correspondence
The constitution prohibits entry
into homes without the owner's
permission, except when police
present a warrant in accordance
with the law; however, there were
credible reports that security
forces sometimes failed to obtain
warrants. Only police officers and
public prosecutors carrying a
warrant are permitted entry into
homes. Officers' actions in
searching premises are subject to
review, and officers are subject
to disciplinary action if their
actions are judged to be
irresponsible. Local custom and
practice place a high value on
privacy, and entry into private
homes without owners' permission
was rare. A female police officer
is required to be present during
the search of a private home when
male family members are absent.
Authorities do not commonly screen
private correspondence; however,
there have been reports of
censorship of incoming
international mail. The
government-owned Internet
provider, Etisalat, regularly
blocks internet sites determined
to be "objectionable" (see section
2.a.).
Family matters for Muslims are
governed by Shari'a and the local
Shari'a courts. Muslim women are
forbidden to marry non-Muslims. In
such cases, both parties can be
arrested and tried. However,
Muslim men are free to marry all
women "of the book," i.e., Muslim,
Christian, and Jewish women (see
section 5).
Section 2 Respect for Civil
Liberties, Including:
a. Freedom of Speech and Press
Article 30 of the constitution
provides for freedom of speech and
of the press; however, the
government restricted these rights
in practice. The UAE Print and
Publication Law prohibits, under
penalty of imprisonment, criticism
of the government, ruling
families, and friendly
governments, as well as other
statements that threaten social
stability; however, the law was
rarely enforced because
journalists practiced
self-censorship. The government
tries complaints against
journalists under the Penal Code.
Two of the country's newspapers,
al-Ittihad and al-Bayan, were
government-owned. The country's
largest Arabic language newspaper,
al-Khaleej, was privately owned
but received government subsidies.
The country's largest English
language newspaper, Gulf News, was
also privately owned. Newspapers
often relied on news agencies for
material. The government-owned
Emirates News Agency regularly
provided material printed verbatim
from many newspapers and from
government officials.
By law, the Ministry of
Information licenses all
publications. The ministry is
informed of the appointment of
editors and is responsible for
issuing editors their press
credentials. The Press and
Publications Law governs press
content and contains a list of
proscribed subjects. Government
officials reportedly warned
journalists when they published
material deemed politically or
culturally sensitive. According to
Ministry of Information and Dubai
Police officials, journalists were
not given specific publishing
instructions. Self-censorship was
the practice, with the ministry
relying on editors' and
journalists' discretion to publish
or refrain from publishing
material which could cause them
problems.
A 2002 de facto ban prohibiting 10
prominent intellectuals from
publishing opinion pieces in the
country's Arabic and English
language media continued. The ban
was lifted in 2004 for at least
two of the individuals, and they
have since returned to writing and
teaching. There was one new report
of an academic that was banned
from teaching in the university,
although no reason was initially
given and no further details were
available.
While self-censorship affected
what was reported locally, foreign
journalists and news organizations
operating out of the Dubai Media
Free Zone reported no restrictions
on the content of print and
broadcast material produced for
use outside the country. Broadcast
content within the Dubai Media
Free Zone is regulated by the Free
Zone Authority for Technology and
Media. There were reports that
some broadcast channels in the
Media Free Zone broadcast songs
and cellular short message service
(SMS) messages described as
"indecent" by government
officials, which were accessed by
the local audience. In response,
on April 16, Dubai Police and the
Juvenile Welfare Association
launched a five-year campaign to
spread the message that indecent
content would not be tolerated
within the Media Free Zone.
Except for those located in
Dubai's Media Free Zone, most
television and radio stations were
government-owned and conformed to
unpublished government reporting
guidelines. Satellite receiving
dishes were widespread and
provided access to international
broadcasts without apparent
censorship. The main pan-Arab
dailies were not censored and were
distributed on the day of
publication. Censors at the
Ministry of Information and
Culture reviewed all imported
media and banned or censored
before distribution material
considered pornographic,
excessively violent, derogatory to
Islam, supportive of certain
Israeli government positions,
unduly critical of friendly
countries, or critical of the
government or ruling families.
On June 15, Basma al-Jandaly, a
local newspaper reporter, was
arrested at the Dubai airport
because of an article she had
written in February about a man
who had stalked and slashed women
with a knife in Sharjah Emirate.
The warrant issued by Sharjah
police contended that her article
in Dubai's leading English daily,
Gulf News, may have helped the
attacker escape by alerting him to
the investigation. The interior
minister immediately intervened on
the reporter's behalf and ordered
her released the following day.
The minister also issued a
subsequent directive that all
police departments must establish
standard operating procedures for
dealing with complaints against
the press that will allow
journalists to do their jobs
without undo interference.
On July 26, two journalists were
found guilty of defamation and
libel for publishing opinion
pieces in al-Ittihad newspaper in
2003, and were each fined $5,465
(20,000 dirhams). According to
press reports, one of the
journalists criticized a decision
by the Ministry of Education to
alter approved curriculums and
cancel some subjects at several
private schools midway through the
academic year, while the other
journalist was tried as an
accomplice because he was the
managing editor.
Internet access was provided
through the state‑owned monopoly
Etisalat. A proxy server, intended
to block material regarded as
pornographic, violent, morally
offensive, or anti-governmental,
as well as sites promoting radical
Islamic ideologies, in practice
blocked broad categories of sites
including many that did not meet
the intended criteria, including
www.newyorktimes.com and
www.cnn.com. The Etisalat proxy
server provided access to America
OnLine email but blocked other
features that enable users to chat
online. Etisalat denied having the
authority to block any site, and
referred all complaints and
suggestions to the Ministry of
Information. Etisalat occasionally
solicited suggestions from users
regarding "objectionable" sites,
and at times the government
responded by blocking some
politically oriented sites, which
were sometimes later unblocked.
Etisalat also blocked commercial
"voice‑chat" and Voice over
Internet Protocol (VOIP) Web sites
on the Internet. The proxy server
did not affect Internet access in
Dubai's Internet City and Media
City.
Academic materials destined for
schools were routinely censored.
Students were banned from reading
texts featuring sexuality or
pictures of the human body.
b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly
and Association
Article 33 of the constitution
provides for freedom of assembly
and association. Organized public
gatherings require a government
permit. No permits were given for
organized public gatherings for
political purposes. In practice,
the government did not regularly
interfere with informal gatherings
held without a government permit
in public places, unless there
were complaints.
Freedom of Assembly
During the year, there were
approximately 20 widely
publicized, organized gatherings
of workers complaining of unpaid
wages and unsuitable working
conditions before the Ministry of
Labor and Social Affairs building.
These gatherings occurred without
prior government permission but
also without government
interference (see section 6).
Citizens normally confined their
political discussions to the
frequent gatherings, or majlises,
held in private homes. There were
many citizen associations
subsidized by the government,
organized for economic, religious,
labor, social, cultural, athletic,
and other purposes, but not for
political purposes.
Freedom of Association
There are no political
organizations, political parties,
independent human rights groups,
or trade unions (see sections 3
and 6.a.). All nongovernmental
organizations (NGOs) are required
to register with the Ministry of
Labor and Social Affairs, after
which they may receive subsidies
from the government based on the
membership size. Approximately 100
domestic NGOs were registered with
the ministry. However, despite the
requirement, more than 20
unregistered local NGOs focused on
non-political topics, operate with
little or no government
interference. The Human Rights
Committee of the Jurists
Association, a
government-subsidized association
of lawyers and judicial personnel,
focused on local and regional
human rights issues. The
percentage of citizen membership
in NGOs varied widely. All private
associations, including children's
clubs, charitable groups, and
hobby associations, required
approval and licensing by local
authorities, although this
requirement was enforced loosely
in some emirates (see section 4).
Private associations must follow
the government's censorship
guidelines and receive prior
government approval before
publishing any material.
Participation by NGO members in
any event outside the country is
subsidized and directed.
Participants must obtain
government permission before
attending such events, even if
they are not speakers.
c. Freedom of Religion
The constitution provides for
freedom of religion in accordance
with established customs, although
these customs restrict this right
in practice. The constitution
declares that Islam is the
official religion of all seven
emirates. According to the
country's first census in 2001, 76
percent of the 4.04 million total
population was Muslim, 9 percent
was Christian, and 15 percent
belonged to other religions. There
is a small resident Jewish
population of unknown size; there
are no synagogues. There were no
reports of anti-Semitic acts or
statements.
The government controlled all
Sunni and Shi'a mosques,
prohibited the proselytizing of
Muslims, and restricted freedom of
assembly and association, thereby
limiting the ability of religious
groups without dedicated religious
buildings to worship and conduct
business. The government funded or
subsidized approximately 95
percent of Sunni mosques and
employed all Sunni imams;
approximately 5 percent of Sunni
mosques were entirely private, and
several prominent mosques have
large private endowments. A
committee of the Ministry of
Justice, Islamic Affairs, and
Endowments drafts and distributes
all Friday sermons to Sunni and
Shi'a imams. The government
monitors all sermons for political
content. During the year, the
ministry distributed Friday
sermons that condemned terrorism
and extremism and encouraged
moderation in Islam. The effort
was covered widely in print and
broadcast media.
The government supports a moderate
interpretation of Islam; however,
as the state religion, Islam is
favored over other religions and
conversion to Islam is viewed
favorably. All Sunni imams are
employees of either individual
emirate departments or of the
federal Ministry of Justice,
Islamic Affairs, and Endowments.
Dubai's department of Islamic
affairs and endowments has
approval authority over preachers
in that emirate's private mosques.
The Shi'a minority, concentrated
in the northern emirates, was free
to worship and maintain its own
mosques. All Shi'a mosques were
considered private and received no
funds from the government. The
government did not appoint sheikhs
for Shi'a mosques, but it did
monitor all sermons closely. Shi'a
Muslims in Dubai can pursue Shi'a
family law cases through a special
Shi'a council rather than the
Shari'a courts.
Several non-Muslim groups own
houses of worship where they can
practice their religion freely,
although the local ruler owns the
land. Groups that did not have
their own buildings were limited
in their ability to assemble for
worship and required to use the
facilities of other religious
organizations or worship in
private homes. The police or other
security forces did not interfere
with these gatherings.
Individual emirates exercised
considerable autonomy in religious
matters. There did not appear to
be a formalized method of granting
official status to religious
groups. Facilities for Christian
congregations were far greater in
number and size than those for
other non-Muslim groups, which
significantly outnumber the
Christian population. There are 24
Christian churches in the country,
and Christian primary and
secondary schools operate in four
emirates. There is one temple for
both Sikhs and Hindus located in
Dubai. There are no Buddhist
temples; however, Buddhists, along
with Hindus and Sikhs in cities
without temples, conducted
religious ceremonies in private
homes without interference. There
are only two cremation facilities
and associated cemeteries for the
large Hindu community, one in
Dubai and the other in Abu Dhabi.
Official permission must be
obtained to use the facilities in
every instance, which poses a
hardship for the large Hindu
community. In October, the
government refused to allow the
Hindu community in Abu Dhabi to
cremate the body of an Indian
construction worker.
The government prohibits Muslims
from converting to other
religions. Although non-Muslims in
the country are free to practice
their religion, they are subject
to criminal prosecution,
imprisonment, and deportation if
found proselytizing or
distributing religious literature
to Muslims. There are no specific
laws against missionary
activities, and there were no
reports of authorities revoking
residence permits of persons
suspected of such activities. On
February 21, two foreign women on
a mission trip with the Tom Cox
World Ministries were arrested by
Dubai Police while passing out
Bibles and religious CDs during
the Dubai Shopping Festival. They
were charged with possession and
distribution of religious
materials (26 CDs and 19 Bibles),
and being an "affront to Islam."
Dubai Police released the two
women within hours of their
arrest, but confiscated their
passports. On March 3, both women
departed the country. Missionaries
have performed humanitarian work
since before the country's
independence in 1971. There is no
restriction on proselytizing
non-Muslims.
The country's sole Internet
service provider, Etisalat,
blocked websites containing
religious information. These sites
included information on the Baha'i
Faith, Judaism, negative critiques
of Islam, and testimonies of
former Muslims who had converted
to Christianity. For a more
detailed discussion, see the 2005
International Religious Freedom
Report.
d. Freedom of Movement Within the
Country, Foreign Travel,
Emigration, and Repatriation
|